http://www.google.com/url?q=http://popup.lala.com/popup/504684676488258962&ei=QlB4S8z5JJSwNpSFqJcP&sa=X&oi=music_play_track&resnum=1&ct=result&cd=2&ved=0CAoQ0wQoADAA&usg=AFQjCNEvLvu4GtwZmk9RIaLE_UX1bTyh2Q
The title expresses the 3 laws of thermodynamics.
You can't win.
The "can't win" law is that energy is neither create nor destroyed. This is the conservation of energy that we could initially and naively be hopeful about. If someone did not know about the second law, it would make them think that they could keep reusing the same energy. If someone tries to sell you a perpetual motion machine, keep your money in your pocket (even if that perpetual motion machine is a water fuel engine for your car.)
You can't break even
The big gotcha is the second law of "you can't break even". This is the law everyone would love to break. Here is where entropy steals your free lunch. Take the car example in the book. We take hydrocarbons that have energy in chemical bonds. We burn it causing little explosions in our engine. That explosion is coverting into kinetic energy.... the car moves. The burning has some waste heat. Heat is 2 things: radiant heat and the kinetic energy of molecules moving faster. Surrounding molecules are moving faster. As they move faster then bump into other molecules transmitting the heat (faster motion). It is sort of like a multi-dimensional billard game. The heat runs away in all directions never to be seen again. Radiant heat is also running away in all direction. (Both are still energy but it is no longer useful, because it is randomized). One fast moving molecule distributed among millons of slow moving molecules cannot be harnessed. Ok but we still have the kinetic energy of the car, but on earth we lose that too. It is dissipated by friction of the tires on the surface and friction of the car body with air. Friction also turns into heat energy.
So what if we say this combustion is wasteful. It makes lots of heat. What if we could do something like our bodies, where we break chemical bonds in sugars to get energy without fast, hot combustion. Sorry; after useful chemical and mechanical energy is derived from the molecule, this energy is also eventually lost to heat energy . (otherwise you would not need to eat after you were full grown.)
Yes in machines, you can recycle a tiny percentage of this "waste" heat energy to derive some energy but only when the heat is concentrated. In that case, if you can move that concentrated heat from the hot area to a colder area or if you can use the heat to create expansion, you can extract some kinetic energy. HOWEVER, eventually the heat will be dispersed and you can get no useful work from it. You cannot harvest random heat (1 hot molecule out of millions of colder one) to do work. You cannot derive work from disperse or random energy. And you cannot create non-random energy out of random energy without putting in more energy, which defeats the purpose of trying to get energy out of a system.
Physics for future presidents
For an excellent lecture on this topic, listen to lecture 2 of "Physics for Future Presidents" http://webcast.berkeley.edu/media/common/media/ce0e2b00-c7c8-49de-bf13-15f4416a8674_opencast_audio_course_alldist.m4a
If you are interested in the entire series Physics for future Presidents lectures see
http://webcast.berkeley.edu/course_details_new.php?seriesid=2009-B-51905|2009-B-69390&semesterid=2009-B
On this page you can choose if you want audio for your ipod or video (with exciting demos) on your video ipod or computer. (Hopefully you have high speed internet with no RUP.
Look at this 2009 version not the 2010 version. Prior to 2010 this course was given by Dr Muller. He is the original designer of the Physics for Future Presidents course. This was voted the best class on the UCB campus. For more information see: http://muller.lbl.gov/
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I LOVE YOUR POST! The links were awesome and you actually helped me with our chapter homework this week! Great work!
ReplyDeleteVery nice post! Nice neat sections and everything.
ReplyDeleteLooking at your reference to the car analogy, a good example of energy reuse (or another use thereof) is actually (in most) your car's AC heating system. Hot water in the cars cooling system run though an optional auxiliary radiator of sorts, heating air blown into the cabin. But then you still loose energy to the fan. No breaking even still, and since I can't magically teleport to school yet, still no getting out of that game.
I think that people can get stuck on the "energy can’t be destroyed, nor created" part and don't realize how little energy we can recycle compared to how much is lost to the environment. It seems like we would be more productive to develop more ways to conserve energy, instead of just finding ways to re-use energy, because like you said, in some cases, or many, it would be counter productive because you would be putting out energy to recycle it. I do think it’s important to re-use as much as we can, but I don't think that will solve the energy problem. I think the solution is more in us using our energy wisely and not wasting it.
ReplyDelete(By the way, I LOVE that trail link you put up. Hiking is one of my favorite things to do, especially by the river, and all the info on there is awesome. Thanks!)
Wow, I amazed about your post! I'm glad you brought up the point of not being able to creat energy w/o putting more energy in. Using more energy to create more energy wouldn't make much sense unless it could be done in an enviromentally friendly way, which so far hasn't happened yet. Unfortunately we can't capture the heat from cars yet to make them more fuel effecient.
ReplyDeleteAwesome, well thought out post! Great descriptions of the 1st and 2nd Laws...
ReplyDelete